mirror of
https://github.com/tildearrow/furnace.git
synced 2024-12-04 18:27:25 +00:00
400 lines
16 KiB
Text
400 lines
16 KiB
Text
|
@node Other Important Topics, FFTW Reference, Tutorial, Top
|
||
|
@chapter Other Important Topics
|
||
|
@menu
|
||
|
* SIMD alignment and fftw_malloc::
|
||
|
* Multi-dimensional Array Format::
|
||
|
* Words of Wisdom-Saving Plans::
|
||
|
* Caveats in Using Wisdom::
|
||
|
@end menu
|
||
|
|
||
|
@c ------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
@node SIMD alignment and fftw_malloc, Multi-dimensional Array Format, Other Important Topics, Other Important Topics
|
||
|
@section SIMD alignment and fftw_malloc
|
||
|
|
||
|
SIMD, which stands for ``Single Instruction Multiple Data,'' is a set of
|
||
|
special operations supported by some processors to perform a single
|
||
|
operation on several numbers (usually 2 or 4) simultaneously. SIMD
|
||
|
floating-point instructions are available on several popular CPUs:
|
||
|
SSE/SSE2/AVX/AVX2/AVX512/KCVI on some x86/x86-64 processors, AltiVec and
|
||
|
VSX on some POWER/PowerPCs, NEON on some ARM models. FFTW can be
|
||
|
compiled to support the SIMD instructions on any of these systems.
|
||
|
@cindex SIMD
|
||
|
@cindex SSE
|
||
|
@cindex SSE2
|
||
|
@cindex AVX
|
||
|
@cindex AVX2
|
||
|
@cindex AVX512
|
||
|
@cindex AltiVec
|
||
|
@cindex VSX
|
||
|
@cindex precision
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
A program linking to an FFTW library compiled with SIMD support can
|
||
|
obtain a nonnegligible speedup for most complex and r2c/c2r
|
||
|
transforms. In order to obtain this speedup, however, the arrays of
|
||
|
complex (or real) data passed to FFTW must be specially aligned in
|
||
|
memory (typically 16-byte aligned), and often this alignment is more
|
||
|
stringent than that provided by the usual @code{malloc} (etc.)
|
||
|
allocation routines.
|
||
|
|
||
|
@cindex portability
|
||
|
In order to guarantee proper alignment for SIMD, therefore, in case
|
||
|
your program is ever linked against a SIMD-using FFTW, we recommend
|
||
|
allocating your transform data with @code{fftw_malloc} and
|
||
|
de-allocating it with @code{fftw_free}.
|
||
|
@findex fftw_malloc
|
||
|
@findex fftw_free
|
||
|
These have exactly the same interface and behavior as
|
||
|
@code{malloc}/@code{free}, except that for a SIMD FFTW they ensure
|
||
|
that the returned pointer has the necessary alignment (by calling
|
||
|
@code{memalign} or its equivalent on your OS).
|
||
|
|
||
|
You are not @emph{required} to use @code{fftw_malloc}. You can
|
||
|
allocate your data in any way that you like, from @code{malloc} to
|
||
|
@code{new} (in C++) to a fixed-size array declaration. If the array
|
||
|
happens not to be properly aligned, FFTW will not use the SIMD
|
||
|
extensions.
|
||
|
@cindex C++
|
||
|
|
||
|
@findex fftw_alloc_real
|
||
|
@findex fftw_alloc_complex
|
||
|
Since @code{fftw_malloc} only ever needs to be used for real and
|
||
|
complex arrays, we provide two convenient wrapper routines
|
||
|
@code{fftw_alloc_real(N)} and @code{fftw_alloc_complex(N)} that are
|
||
|
equivalent to @code{(double*)fftw_malloc(sizeof(double) * N)} and
|
||
|
@code{(fftw_complex*)fftw_malloc(sizeof(fftw_complex) * N)},
|
||
|
respectively (or their equivalents in other precisions).
|
||
|
|
||
|
@c ------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
@node Multi-dimensional Array Format, Words of Wisdom-Saving Plans, SIMD alignment and fftw_malloc, Other Important Topics
|
||
|
@section Multi-dimensional Array Format
|
||
|
|
||
|
This section describes the format in which multi-dimensional arrays
|
||
|
are stored in FFTW. We felt that a detailed discussion of this topic
|
||
|
was necessary. Since several different formats are common, this topic
|
||
|
is often a source of confusion.
|
||
|
|
||
|
@menu
|
||
|
* Row-major Format::
|
||
|
* Column-major Format::
|
||
|
* Fixed-size Arrays in C::
|
||
|
* Dynamic Arrays in C::
|
||
|
* Dynamic Arrays in C-The Wrong Way::
|
||
|
@end menu
|
||
|
|
||
|
@c =========>
|
||
|
@node Row-major Format, Column-major Format, Multi-dimensional Array Format, Multi-dimensional Array Format
|
||
|
@subsection Row-major Format
|
||
|
@cindex row-major
|
||
|
|
||
|
The multi-dimensional arrays passed to @code{fftw_plan_dft} etcetera
|
||
|
are expected to be stored as a single contiguous block in
|
||
|
@dfn{row-major} order (sometimes called ``C order''). Basically, this
|
||
|
means that as you step through adjacent memory locations, the first
|
||
|
dimension's index varies most slowly and the last dimension's index
|
||
|
varies most quickly.
|
||
|
|
||
|
To be more explicit, let us consider an array of rank @math{d} whose
|
||
|
dimensions are @ndims{}. Now, we specify a location in the array by a
|
||
|
sequence of @math{d} (zero-based) indices, one for each dimension:
|
||
|
@tex
|
||
|
$(i_0, i_1, i_2, \ldots, i_{d-1})$.
|
||
|
@end tex
|
||
|
@ifinfo
|
||
|
(i[0], i[1], ..., i[d-1]).
|
||
|
@end ifinfo
|
||
|
@html
|
||
|
(i<sub>0</sub>, i<sub>1</sub>, i<sub>2</sub>,..., i<sub>d-1</sub>).
|
||
|
@end html
|
||
|
If the array is stored in row-major
|
||
|
order, then this element is located at the position
|
||
|
@tex
|
||
|
$i_{d-1} + n_{d-1} (i_{d-2} + n_{d-2} (\ldots + n_1 i_0))$.
|
||
|
@end tex
|
||
|
@ifinfo
|
||
|
i[d-1] + n[d-1] * (i[d-2] + n[d-2] * (... + n[1] * i[0])).
|
||
|
@end ifinfo
|
||
|
@html
|
||
|
i<sub>d-1</sub> + n<sub>d-1</sub> * (i<sub>d-2</sub> + n<sub>d-2</sub> * (... + n<sub>1</sub> * i<sub>0</sub>)).
|
||
|
@end html
|
||
|
|
||
|
Note that, for the ordinary complex DFT, each element of the array
|
||
|
must be of type @code{fftw_complex}; i.e. a (real, imaginary) pair of
|
||
|
(double-precision) numbers.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In the advanced FFTW interface, the physical dimensions @math{n} from
|
||
|
which the indices are computed can be different from (larger than)
|
||
|
the logical dimensions of the transform to be computed, in order to
|
||
|
transform a subset of a larger array.
|
||
|
@cindex advanced interface
|
||
|
Note also that, in the advanced interface, the expression above is
|
||
|
multiplied by a @dfn{stride} to get the actual array index---this is
|
||
|
useful in situations where each element of the multi-dimensional array
|
||
|
is actually a data structure (or another array), and you just want to
|
||
|
transform a single field. In the basic interface, however, the stride
|
||
|
is 1.
|
||
|
@cindex stride
|
||
|
|
||
|
@c =========>
|
||
|
@node Column-major Format, Fixed-size Arrays in C, Row-major Format, Multi-dimensional Array Format
|
||
|
@subsection Column-major Format
|
||
|
@cindex column-major
|
||
|
|
||
|
Readers from the Fortran world are used to arrays stored in
|
||
|
@dfn{column-major} order (sometimes called ``Fortran order''). This is
|
||
|
essentially the exact opposite of row-major order in that, here, the
|
||
|
@emph{first} dimension's index varies most quickly.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you have an array stored in column-major order and wish to
|
||
|
transform it using FFTW, it is quite easy to do. When creating the
|
||
|
plan, simply pass the dimensions of the array to the planner in
|
||
|
@emph{reverse order}. For example, if your array is a rank three
|
||
|
@code{N x M x L} matrix in column-major order, you should pass the
|
||
|
dimensions of the array as if it were an @code{L x M x N} matrix
|
||
|
(which it is, from the perspective of FFTW). This is done for you
|
||
|
@emph{automatically} by the FFTW legacy-Fortran interface
|
||
|
(@pxref{Calling FFTW from Legacy Fortran}), but you must do it
|
||
|
manually with the modern Fortran interface (@pxref{Reversing array
|
||
|
dimensions}).
|
||
|
@cindex Fortran interface
|
||
|
|
||
|
@c =========>
|
||
|
@node Fixed-size Arrays in C, Dynamic Arrays in C, Column-major Format, Multi-dimensional Array Format
|
||
|
@subsection Fixed-size Arrays in C
|
||
|
@cindex C multi-dimensional arrays
|
||
|
|
||
|
A multi-dimensional array whose size is declared at compile time in C
|
||
|
is @emph{already} in row-major order. You don't have to do anything
|
||
|
special to transform it. For example:
|
||
|
|
||
|
@example
|
||
|
@{
|
||
|
fftw_complex data[N0][N1][N2];
|
||
|
fftw_plan plan;
|
||
|
...
|
||
|
plan = fftw_plan_dft_3d(N0, N1, N2, &data[0][0][0], &data[0][0][0],
|
||
|
FFTW_FORWARD, FFTW_ESTIMATE);
|
||
|
...
|
||
|
@}
|
||
|
@end example
|
||
|
|
||
|
This will plan a 3d in-place transform of size @code{N0 x N1 x N2}.
|
||
|
Notice how we took the address of the zero-th element to pass to the
|
||
|
planner (we could also have used a typecast).
|
||
|
|
||
|
However, we tend to @emph{discourage} users from declaring their
|
||
|
arrays in this way, for two reasons. First, this allocates the array
|
||
|
on the stack (``automatic'' storage), which has a very limited size on
|
||
|
most operating systems (declaring an array with more than a few
|
||
|
thousand elements will often cause a crash). (You can get around this
|
||
|
limitation on many systems by declaring the array as
|
||
|
@code{static} and/or global, but that has its own drawbacks.)
|
||
|
Second, it may not optimally align the array for use with a SIMD
|
||
|
FFTW (@pxref{SIMD alignment and fftw_malloc}). Instead, we recommend
|
||
|
using @code{fftw_malloc}, as described below.
|
||
|
|
||
|
@c =========>
|
||
|
@node Dynamic Arrays in C, Dynamic Arrays in C-The Wrong Way, Fixed-size Arrays in C, Multi-dimensional Array Format
|
||
|
@subsection Dynamic Arrays in C
|
||
|
|
||
|
We recommend allocating most arrays dynamically, with
|
||
|
@code{fftw_malloc}. This isn't too hard to do, although it is not as
|
||
|
straightforward for multi-dimensional arrays as it is for
|
||
|
one-dimensional arrays.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Creating the array is simple: using a dynamic-allocation routine like
|
||
|
@code{fftw_malloc}, allocate an array big enough to store N
|
||
|
@code{fftw_complex} values (for a complex DFT), where N is the product
|
||
|
of the sizes of the array dimensions (i.e. the total number of complex
|
||
|
values in the array). For example, here is code to allocate a
|
||
|
@threedims{5,12,27} rank-3 array:
|
||
|
@findex fftw_malloc
|
||
|
|
||
|
@example
|
||
|
fftw_complex *an_array;
|
||
|
an_array = (fftw_complex*) fftw_malloc(5*12*27 * sizeof(fftw_complex));
|
||
|
@end example
|
||
|
|
||
|
Accessing the array elements, however, is more tricky---you can't
|
||
|
simply use multiple applications of the @samp{[]} operator like you
|
||
|
could for fixed-size arrays. Instead, you have to explicitly compute
|
||
|
the offset into the array using the formula given earlier for
|
||
|
row-major arrays. For example, to reference the @math{(i,j,k)}-th
|
||
|
element of the array allocated above, you would use the expression
|
||
|
@code{an_array[k + 27 * (j + 12 * i)]}.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This pain can be alleviated somewhat by defining appropriate macros,
|
||
|
or, in C++, creating a class and overloading the @samp{()} operator.
|
||
|
The recent C99 standard provides a way to reinterpret the dynamic
|
||
|
array as a ``variable-length'' multi-dimensional array amenable to
|
||
|
@samp{[]}, but this feature is not yet widely supported by compilers.
|
||
|
@cindex C99
|
||
|
@cindex C++
|
||
|
|
||
|
@c =========>
|
||
|
@node Dynamic Arrays in C-The Wrong Way, , Dynamic Arrays in C, Multi-dimensional Array Format
|
||
|
@subsection Dynamic Arrays in C---The Wrong Way
|
||
|
|
||
|
A different method for allocating multi-dimensional arrays in C is
|
||
|
often suggested that is incompatible with FFTW: @emph{using it will
|
||
|
cause FFTW to die a painful death}. We discuss the technique here,
|
||
|
however, because it is so commonly known and used. This method is to
|
||
|
create arrays of pointers of arrays of pointers of @dots{}etcetera.
|
||
|
For example, the analogue in this method to the example above is:
|
||
|
|
||
|
@example
|
||
|
int i,j;
|
||
|
fftw_complex ***a_bad_array; /* @r{another way to make a 5x12x27 array} */
|
||
|
|
||
|
a_bad_array = (fftw_complex ***) malloc(5 * sizeof(fftw_complex **));
|
||
|
for (i = 0; i < 5; ++i) @{
|
||
|
a_bad_array[i] =
|
||
|
(fftw_complex **) malloc(12 * sizeof(fftw_complex *));
|
||
|
for (j = 0; j < 12; ++j)
|
||
|
a_bad_array[i][j] =
|
||
|
(fftw_complex *) malloc(27 * sizeof(fftw_complex));
|
||
|
@}
|
||
|
@end example
|
||
|
|
||
|
As you can see, this sort of array is inconvenient to allocate (and
|
||
|
deallocate). On the other hand, it has the advantage that the
|
||
|
@math{(i,j,k)}-th element can be referenced simply by
|
||
|
@code{a_bad_array[i][j][k]}.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you like this technique and want to maximize convenience in accessing
|
||
|
the array, but still want to pass the array to FFTW, you can use a
|
||
|
hybrid method. Allocate the array as one contiguous block, but also
|
||
|
declare an array of arrays of pointers that point to appropriate places
|
||
|
in the block. That sort of trick is beyond the scope of this
|
||
|
documentation; for more information on multi-dimensional arrays in C,
|
||
|
see the @code{comp.lang.c}
|
||
|
@uref{http://c-faq.com/aryptr/dynmuldimary.html, FAQ}.
|
||
|
|
||
|
@c ------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
@node Words of Wisdom-Saving Plans, Caveats in Using Wisdom, Multi-dimensional Array Format, Other Important Topics
|
||
|
@section Words of Wisdom---Saving Plans
|
||
|
@cindex wisdom
|
||
|
@cindex saving plans to disk
|
||
|
|
||
|
FFTW implements a method for saving plans to disk and restoring them.
|
||
|
In fact, what FFTW does is more general than just saving and loading
|
||
|
plans. The mechanism is called @dfn{wisdom}. Here, we describe
|
||
|
this feature at a high level. @xref{FFTW Reference}, for a less casual
|
||
|
but more complete discussion of how to use wisdom in FFTW.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Plans created with the @code{FFTW_MEASURE}, @code{FFTW_PATIENT}, or
|
||
|
@code{FFTW_EXHAUSTIVE} options produce near-optimal FFT performance,
|
||
|
but may require a long time to compute because FFTW must measure the
|
||
|
runtime of many possible plans and select the best one. This setup is
|
||
|
designed for the situations where so many transforms of the same size
|
||
|
must be computed that the start-up time is irrelevant. For short
|
||
|
initialization times, but slower transforms, we have provided
|
||
|
@code{FFTW_ESTIMATE}. The @code{wisdom} mechanism is a way to get the
|
||
|
best of both worlds: you compute a good plan once, save it to
|
||
|
disk, and later reload it as many times as necessary. The wisdom
|
||
|
mechanism can actually save and reload many plans at once, not just
|
||
|
one.
|
||
|
@ctindex FFTW_MEASURE
|
||
|
@ctindex FFTW_PATIENT
|
||
|
@ctindex FFTW_EXHAUSTIVE
|
||
|
@ctindex FFTW_ESTIMATE
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Whenever you create a plan, the FFTW planner accumulates wisdom, which
|
||
|
is information sufficient to reconstruct the plan. After planning,
|
||
|
you can save this information to disk by means of the function:
|
||
|
@example
|
||
|
int fftw_export_wisdom_to_filename(const char *filename);
|
||
|
@end example
|
||
|
@findex fftw_export_wisdom_to_filename
|
||
|
(This function returns non-zero on success.)
|
||
|
|
||
|
The next time you run the program, you can restore the wisdom with
|
||
|
@code{fftw_import_wisdom_from_filename} (which also returns non-zero on success),
|
||
|
and then recreate the plan using the same flags as before.
|
||
|
@example
|
||
|
int fftw_import_wisdom_from_filename(const char *filename);
|
||
|
@end example
|
||
|
@findex fftw_import_wisdom_from_filename
|
||
|
|
||
|
Wisdom is automatically used for any size to which it is applicable, as
|
||
|
long as the planner flags are not more ``patient'' than those with which
|
||
|
the wisdom was created. For example, wisdom created with
|
||
|
@code{FFTW_MEASURE} can be used if you later plan with
|
||
|
@code{FFTW_ESTIMATE} or @code{FFTW_MEASURE}, but not with
|
||
|
@code{FFTW_PATIENT}.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The @code{wisdom} is cumulative, and is stored in a global, private
|
||
|
data structure managed internally by FFTW. The storage space required
|
||
|
is minimal, proportional to the logarithm of the sizes the wisdom was
|
||
|
generated from. If memory usage is a concern, however, the wisdom can
|
||
|
be forgotten and its associated memory freed by calling:
|
||
|
@example
|
||
|
void fftw_forget_wisdom(void);
|
||
|
@end example
|
||
|
@findex fftw_forget_wisdom
|
||
|
|
||
|
Wisdom can be exported to a file, a string, or any other medium.
|
||
|
For details, see @ref{Wisdom}.
|
||
|
|
||
|
@node Caveats in Using Wisdom, , Words of Wisdom-Saving Plans, Other Important Topics
|
||
|
@section Caveats in Using Wisdom
|
||
|
@cindex wisdom, problems with
|
||
|
|
||
|
@quotation
|
||
|
@html
|
||
|
<i>
|
||
|
@end html
|
||
|
For in much wisdom is much grief, and he that increaseth knowledge
|
||
|
increaseth sorrow.
|
||
|
@html
|
||
|
</i>
|
||
|
@end html
|
||
|
[Ecclesiastes 1:18]
|
||
|
@cindex Ecclesiastes
|
||
|
@end quotation
|
||
|
@iftex
|
||
|
@medskip
|
||
|
@end iftex
|
||
|
|
||
|
@cindex portability
|
||
|
There are pitfalls to using wisdom, in that it can negate FFTW's
|
||
|
ability to adapt to changing hardware and other conditions. For
|
||
|
example, it would be perfectly possible to export wisdom from a
|
||
|
program running on one processor and import it into a program running
|
||
|
on another processor. Doing so, however, would mean that the second
|
||
|
program would use plans optimized for the first processor, instead of
|
||
|
the one it is running on.
|
||
|
|
||
|
It should be safe to reuse wisdom as long as the hardware and program
|
||
|
binaries remain unchanged. (Actually, the optimal plan may change even
|
||
|
between runs of the same binary on identical hardware, due to
|
||
|
differences in the virtual memory environment, etcetera. Users
|
||
|
seriously interested in performance should worry about this problem,
|
||
|
too.) It is likely that, if the same wisdom is used for two
|
||
|
different program binaries, even running on the same machine, the
|
||
|
plans may be sub-optimal because of differing code alignments. It is
|
||
|
therefore wise to recreate wisdom every time an application is
|
||
|
recompiled. The more the underlying hardware and software changes
|
||
|
between the creation of wisdom and its use, the greater grows
|
||
|
the risk of sub-optimal plans.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Nevertheless, if the choice is between using @code{FFTW_ESTIMATE} or
|
||
|
using possibly-suboptimal wisdom (created on the same machine, but for a
|
||
|
different binary), the wisdom is likely to be better. For this reason,
|
||
|
we provide a function to import wisdom from a standard system-wide
|
||
|
location (@code{/etc/fftw/wisdom} on Unix):
|
||
|
@cindex wisdom, system-wide
|
||
|
|
||
|
@example
|
||
|
int fftw_import_system_wisdom(void);
|
||
|
@end example
|
||
|
@findex fftw_import_system_wisdom
|
||
|
|
||
|
FFTW also provides a standalone program, @code{fftw-wisdom} (described
|
||
|
by its own @code{man} page on Unix) with which users can create wisdom,
|
||
|
e.g. for a canonical set of sizes to store in the system wisdom file.
|
||
|
@xref{Wisdom Utilities}.
|
||
|
@cindex fftw-wisdom utility
|
||
|
|