Pica/CommandProcessor: Implement parameter masking.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f37e39deb9
commit
0465adf206
2 changed files with 25 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -24,9 +24,14 @@ static u32 uniform_write_buffer[4];
|
|||
static u32 vs_binary_write_offset = 0;
|
||||
static u32 vs_swizzle_write_offset = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void WritePicaReg(u32 id, u32 value) {
|
||||
static inline void WritePicaReg(u32 id, u32 value, u32 mask) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (id >= registers.NumIds())
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: Figure out how register masking acts on e.g. vs_uniform_setup.set_value
|
||||
u32 old_value = registers[id];
|
||||
registers[id] = value;
|
||||
registers[id] = (old_value & ~mask) | (value & mask);
|
||||
|
||||
switch(id) {
|
||||
// It seems like these trigger vertex rendering
|
||||
|
@ -215,14 +220,17 @@ static std::ptrdiff_t ExecuteCommandBlock(const u32* first_command_word) {
|
|||
|
||||
u32* read_pointer = (u32*)first_command_word;
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: Take parameter mask into consideration!
|
||||
const u32 write_mask = ((header.parameter_mask & 0x1) ? (0xFFu << 0) : 0u) |
|
||||
((header.parameter_mask & 0x2) ? (0xFFu << 8) : 0u) |
|
||||
((header.parameter_mask & 0x4) ? (0xFFu << 16) : 0u) |
|
||||
((header.parameter_mask & 0x8) ? (0xFFu << 24) : 0u);
|
||||
|
||||
WritePicaReg(header.cmd_id, *read_pointer);
|
||||
WritePicaReg(header.cmd_id, *read_pointer, write_mask);
|
||||
read_pointer += 2;
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 1; i < 1+header.extra_data_length; ++i) {
|
||||
u32 cmd = header.cmd_id + ((header.group_commands) ? i : 0);
|
||||
WritePicaReg(cmd, *read_pointer);
|
||||
WritePicaReg(cmd, *read_pointer, write_mask);
|
||||
++read_pointer;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -17,11 +17,22 @@ union CommandHeader {
|
|||
u32 hex;
|
||||
|
||||
BitField< 0, 16, u32> cmd_id;
|
||||
|
||||
// parameter_mask:
|
||||
// Mask applied to the input value to make it possible to update
|
||||
// parts of a register without overwriting its other fields.
|
||||
// first bit: 0x000000FF
|
||||
// second bit: 0x0000FF00
|
||||
// third bit: 0x00FF0000
|
||||
// fourth bit: 0xFF000000
|
||||
BitField<16, 4, u32> parameter_mask;
|
||||
|
||||
BitField<20, 11, u32> extra_data_length;
|
||||
|
||||
BitField<31, 1, u32> group_commands;
|
||||
};
|
||||
static_assert(std::is_standard_layout<CommandHeader>::value == true, "CommandHeader does not use standard layout");
|
||||
static_assert(std::is_standard_layout<CommandHeader>::value == true,
|
||||
"CommandHeader does not use standard layout");
|
||||
static_assert(sizeof(CommandHeader) == sizeof(u32), "CommandHeader has incorrect size!");
|
||||
|
||||
void ProcessCommandList(const u32* list, u32 size);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue